Thursday, April 24, 2014

PRADAXA - THE ANTICOAGULANT WITH NO ANTIDOTE

PRADAXA (DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE MESYLATE

The prescription drug Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate mesylate) is a medication which has been prescribed to hundreds of thousands of patients to thin their blood thereby reducing the risk of stroke and blood clots when they have certain underlying heart disease such as atrial fibrillation or heart valve problems, but not artificial heart valves. On December 19, 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration issued the following Safety Communication about Pradaxa: “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is informing health care professionals and the public that the blood thinner (anticoagulant) Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate mesylate) should not be used to prevent stroke or blood clots (major thromboembolic events) in patients with mechanical heart valves, also known as mechanical prosthetic heart valves. A clinical trial in Europe (the RE-ALIGN trial) was recently stopped because Pradaxa users were more likely to experience strokes, heart attacks, and blood clots forming on the mechanical heart valves than were users of the anticoagulant warfarin. There was also more bleeding after valve surgery in the Pradaxa users than in the warfarin users.”

Warfarin (Brand names include Coumadin, Jantoven, and Uniwarfin) has been on the United States market since about 1954. This well-known anticoagulant continues to be commonly prescribed to patients who are at risk of blood clots which can lead to serious consequences such as stroke and death. While warfarin has been time-tested and proves itself to be quite effective, and relatively safe (“safe” based on a risks and benefits analysis which considers the serious consequences of not anticoagulating patients at high risk of clotting). To maintain safety while taking warfarin, a patient must allow blood levels to be tested about every three months (to make sure there is not too much or too little in a patient’s system) and avoid foods which contain Vitamin K (such as many leafy green vegetables) which can render warfarin ineffective. Failure to take warfarin exactly as prescribed and to monitor warfarin levels can lead to uncontrolled bleeding which if not treated emergently can cause a patient to bleed to death. Fortunately, there are several antidotes to warfarin toxicity – all of which are commonly available to healthcare professionals. Antidotes include injectable Vitamin K, plasma (fresh frozen or cryosupermatant plasma), prothrombin complex concentrates, and recombinant factor VIIa.

One of the big “selling” points for Pradaxa as opposed to warfarin is that the patient taking Pradaxa does not have to submit himself or herself to regular blood draws and dietary restrictions. What promoters of Pradaxa conveniently do not tell physicians and patients is that there is no commonly available antidote for a Pradaxa overdose. Thus, should a patient’s Pradaxa levels reach a toxic level, he or she has a good chance of bleeding to death while physicians watch helplessly. Pradaxa levels are effected by advanced age, renal (kidney) function, extremes in body weight, and drug-drug interactions (aspirin, ibuprofen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and many other commonly used drugs). According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, “In early 2013, there is still no routine coagulation test suitable for monitoring these patients; specific tests are only available in specialized laboratories. In early 2013 there is no antidote for dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban, nor any specific treatment with proven efficacy for severe bleeding linked to these drugs. Recommendations on the management of bleeding in this setting are based mainly on pharmacological parameters and on scarce experimen-Haemodialysis reduces the plasma concentration of dabigatran, while rivaroxaban and apixaban cannot be eliminated by dialysis.”

In the last few years, several thousand patients, who have suffered serious injuries including death, have sued Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the manufacturer of Pradaxa for failing to warn patients and their physicians about the serious adverse events that may result from taking Pradaxa. Many of these suits also allege that Boehringer promoted Pradaxa as being safer than warfarin.

If your physician has prescribed Pradaxa for you, you should immediately discuss whether there are safer alternative drugs for you. After weighing the risks and benefits, you and your physician can determine what drug is best for you. If you have taken Pradaxa, and have suffered uncontrollable bleeding, you should know that attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is available to answer your legal questions and help you determine whether you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer of this drug. You can reach Paul J. Molinaro, M.D. J.D. toll free at (888)MDJDLAW. The initial consultation is also free, and if Paul determines that you have a case, and you decide to hire Paul, he will represent you on a contingent basis.

When You Need a Lawyer, Call the Doctor!
Call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Call (888)MDJDLAW

BREAKING DOWN THE BREAKING DOWN OF VAGINAL MESH

BARD COMPOSIX KUGEL MESH PATCH
        The Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patch is used during surgery to repair ventral (incisional) hernias. When using the patch, the surgeon will insert the folded patch behind the hernia defect, and a “memory recoil ring” allows the patch to spring open and lay flat after insertion. On December 22, 2005, Davol, Inc., a subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc. issued a recall of the patch, because the “memory recoil ring” could break during insertion and cause bowel perforations (rupture) and/or chronic (recurring) intestinal fistulae (abnormal connections or passageways between the intestines and other organs).
        The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued the following statementregarding this patch: “Patients who have been implanted with one of the recalled devices should seek medical attention immediately if they experience symptoms that could be associated with ring breakage such as unexplained or persistent abdominal pain, fever, tenderness at the implant site or other unusual symptoms.” The FDA also noted the following: “An upgraded product design for both product codes is available for replacement. Product codes and lot numbers that contain the re-designed product can easily be identified on the case or unit package with the label stating “Redesigned for improved ring integrity.” If this label is affixed to your case stock and/or individual packages, this product is not affected by this market withdrawal and need not be returned to Davol.”
        If you live in California and your surgeon used the older Bard Composix Kugel Mesh Patch during your hernia repair surgery, you should know that attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is available to answer your legal questions and help you determine whether you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer of this patch. You can reach Paul J. Molinaro, M.D. J.D. toll free at (888)MDJDLAW. The initial consultation is also free, and if Paul determines that you have a case, and you decide to hire Paul, he will represent you on a contingent basis.
When You Need a Lawyer, Call the Doctor!
Call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Call (888)MDJDLAW

GRANUFLO AND HEART ATTACKS IN DIALYSIS PATIENTS

GRANUFLO
         Fresenius Medical Care North America, the manufacturer of GranuFlo advertises this dry acid product on its website by unabashedly stating, “GranuFlo is the most-widely prescribed dry acid product in the dialysis industry today. Its unique composition of evenly distributed electrolytes is the result of our exacting production technology. With GranuFlo’s distinctive proportional component blend in each bag, you have made the safest choice for onsite concentrate mixing.  Safe for your patients and your staff, our utilization of dry Sodium Diacetate eliminates the need for hazardous liquid glacial Acetic Acid, making GranuFlo the safest dry acid product.”
        What the above statement fails to consider is that on March 29, 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of GranuFlo manufactured and distributed from January 2008 through June 2012 (serial numbers ranging from: OFD1201-3B, OFD1251-3B, OFD2123-3B, OFD2201-38, OFD2220-3B, OFD2223-3B, OFD2225-3B, OFD2231-3 B, OFD2251-3B, OFD2301-3B, OFD2323-3 B, OFD2325-3B, OFD3201-3B, OFD3231-3B, OFD3251-3B, OFD3301-3B). The FDA states that the reason for the recall as follows: “The manufacturer is cautioning clinicians to be aware of the concentration of acetate or sodium diacetate (acetic acid plus acetate) contained in Fresenius’ Naturalyte Liquid and Granuflo Dry Acid Concentrate. Inappropriate prescription of these products can lead to a high serum bicarbonate level in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This may contribute to metabolic alkalosis, which is a significant risk factor associated with low blood pressure, hypokalemia, hypoxemia, hypercapnia and cardiac arrhythmia, which, if not appropriately treated, may culminate in cardiopulmonary arrest. This product may cause serious adverse health consequences, including death.”
        An article in The New York Time, dated June 14, 2012, had the following to say about GranuFloand Fresenius Medical Care North America: The Food and Drug Administration is investigating whether the nation’s largest operator of dialysis centers violated federal regulations by failing to inform customers of a potentially lethal risk connected to one of its products, an F.D.A. official said. The company, Fresenius Medical Care, treats more than a third of the estimated 400,000 Americans receiving dialysis.” Thus, there is little room for doubt that GranuFlo is quite a lucrative product forFresenius Medical Care North America.
        The 2012 Annual Report for Fresenius Medical Care North America had this to say about theGrauFlo lawsuits: “On December 12, 2012, a group of plaintiffs’ counsel filed a petition to form a federal multidistrict litigation and thereby consolidate certain lawsuits alleging wrongful deaths and personal injury claims against FMCH and its affiliates. The complaints to be consolidated for pre-trial management allege generally that inadequate labeling and warnings for FMCH’s dialysate concentrate products Naturalyte and GranuFlo caused harm to patients. In addition, a substantial number of similar state court cases have been filed that cannot be formally consolidated with the federal cases. FMCH believes these lawsuits are without merit, and will defend them vigorously.”
        If you or a loved one has been dialyzed with a dialysis unit that was using GranuFlo and suffered a cardiac event (heart failure, heart attack, myocardial infarction, etc.) during dialysis or within twelve hours of being dialyzed, you should know that attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is available to answer your legal questions and help you determine whether you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer of this GranuFlo. You can reach Paul J. Molinaro, M.D. J.D. toll free at (888)MDJDLAW. The initial consultation is also free, and if Paul determines that you have a case, and you decide to hire Paul, he will represent you on a contingent basis.
When You Need a Lawyer, Call the Doctor!
Call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Call (888)MDJDLAW

FOSAMAX AND OSTEONECROSIS OF THE JAW

FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM)
        The prescription drug Fosamax (alendronate sodium) is a medication which has been prescribed to hundreds of thousands of postmenopausal women to treat osteoporosis and help increase bone mass thereby reducing the chance of spinal or non-spinal fractures. Fosamax has also been prescribed to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis. This drug is manufactured in the United States by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. Side effects ofFosamax may include the following:
1. Esophagus problems including irritation, inflammation, or ulcers
2. Low blood calcium levels (hypocalcemia) which may lead to muscle spasms, twitches, or cramps as well as numbness or tingling in the face, fingers, toes, and around the mouth
     ABC News ran a story on May 10, 2012 about the dangers of “bone drugs” stating, “In a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration raised concerns about the potential for some serious side effects in women taking bone-building drugs called bisphosphonates, specifically FosamaxActonel and Reclast. The published findings are not new. In 2011, the agency voiced concerns that taking the drugs long-term may actually make bones weaker and increase the risk of rare but serious side effects such as atypical fractures of the thigh bone, esophageal cancer and osteonecrosis of the jaw, a rare but painful condition in which the jaw bone crumbles. To investigate, the FDA reviewed data from women who had taken the drugs for six to 10 years.” Underscoring just how commonly these medications are prescribed, ABC News commented, “According to the FDA, doctors wrote more than 150 million prescriptions for bisphosphonates between 2005 and 2009.”
     At the end of 2013, Merck settled with about 1,200 plaintiffs alleging that Fosamax caused them to suffer osteonecrosis of the jaw (“ONJ”). ONJ is a rare condition in which the patient suffers degeneration and deterioration of the jaw and often necessitates surgical repair with bone grafting. This recent settlement requires a total of about $27.7 million to be paid by Merck. Before anyone feels bad for Merck, he or she should also know that some researchers estimate that Merck “earned” about $3 billion (with a “b”) in 2007 from Fosamax. There are still many unsettled suits.
     While alendronate sodium does have some appropriate indications, there are serious side effects which can occur. Most of the lawsuits focus on one of two harms – femur fractures or osteonecrosis of the jaw. Each is treated differently by many of the lawyers handling these cases. If your physician has prescribed Fosamax for you, you should immediately discuss whether there are safer alternative drugs for you. After weighing the risks and benefits, you and your physician can determine what drug is best for you. If you have taken Fosamax, and have developed osteonecrosis of the jaw, you should know that attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is available to answer your legal questions and help you determine whether you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer of this drug. You can reach Paul J. Molinaro, M.D. J.D. toll free at (888)MDJDLAW. The initial consultation is also free, and if Paul determines that you have a case, and you decide to hire Paul, he will represent you on a contingent basis.. 
When You Need a Lawyer, Call the Doctor!
Call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Call (888)MDJDLAW

ACTOS AND BLADDER CANCER

ACTOS (PIOGLITAZONE)
        Since 1999, the prescription drug Actos is a medication which has been prescribed to hundreds of thousands of diabetics to control their blood glucose (sugar) levels. However, on June 15, 2011, the United States Food and Drug Administration issued the following Safety Announcement about Actos: “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is informing the public that use of the diabetes medication Actos (pioglitazone) for more than one year may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. Information about this risk will be added to the Warnings and Precautions section of the label for pioglitazone-containing medicines. The patient Medication Guide for these medicines will also be revised to include information on the risk of bladder cancer.”
        As a result of the link between Actos and bladder cancer, France took Actos off its market, and Germany ceased all new Actos prescriptions. However, the Japanese drug manufacturer Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Inc. continues to market Actos across the United States, and this drug is still available in California. Some studies show that the risk of developing bladder cancer due to Actos increases with larger doses and the number of years a patient takes this drug.

         If your physician has prescribed Actos for you, you should immediately discuss whether there are safer alternative drugs for you. After weighing the risks and benefits, you and your physician can determine what drug is best for you. If you live in California, have taken Actos, and have developed bladder cancer, you should know that attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is available to answer your legal questions and help you determine whether you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer of this drug. You can reach Paul J. Molinaro, M.D. J.D. toll free at (888)MDJDLAW. The initial consultation is also free, and if Paul determines that you have a case, and you decide to hire Paul, he will represent you on a contingent basis.
When You Need a Lawyer, Call the Doctor!Call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Call (888)MDJDLAW

TESTOSTERONE THE OLD CURE FOR A NEWLY INVENTED DISEASE CALLED "LOW T"

ANDROGEL (TESTOSTERONE GEL)
        According to its manufacturer, AbbVie, "AndroGel® (testosterone gel) 1% and 1.62% are controlled substances, available by prescription, used to treat adult males who have low or no testosterone." The AndroGel website offers the following ten question yes-no quiz to see whether a man "should talk to" his "doctor about Low Testosterone:"
  1. Do you have a decrease in libido (sex drive)?
  2. Do you have a lack of energy?
  3. Do you have a decrease in strength and/or endurance?
  4. Have you lost height?
  5. Have you noticed a decrease in your enjoyment of life?
  6. Are you sad and/or grumpy?
  7. Are your erections less strong?
  8. Have you noticed a recent deterioration in your ability to play sports?
  9. Are you falling asleep after dinner?
  10. Has there been a recent deterioration in your work performance?
The ten questions might just as well ask, "Are you getting old?" or "Are you naturally aging?" Snake oil salesmen have been selling fountain of youth elixirs since people starting getting old. Fortunately, most snake oils are only harmful to the purchaser's wallet as many of the alleged aging cures are harmless. However, once in a while a potion does contain harmful ingredients or actual medicinal compounds which have major physiological effects. AndroGel seems to be promoted as the cure for a newly discovered disease called, "Low T." However, its safety is in question.

     On January 31, 2014, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Safety Announcement regarding testosterone products. This communication stated, "At this time, FDA has not concluded that FDA-approved testosterone treatment increases the risk of stroke, heart attack, or death. Patients should not stop taking prescribed testosterone products without first discussing any questions or concerns with their health care professionals. Health care professionals should consider whether the benefits of FDA-approved testosterone treatment is likely to exceed the potential risks of treatment. The prescribing information in the drug labels of FDA-approved testosterone products should be followed." While the beginning of this Safety Announcement might not seem alarming, the FDA further states, "None of the FDA-approved testosterone products are approved for use in men with low testosterone levels who lack an associated medical condition. FDA-approved testosterone formulations include the topical gel, transdermal patch, buccal system (applied to upper gum or inner cheek), and injection."

     What is "an associated medical condition?" The manufacturer of AndroGel would have one believe that Low T (the condition of having low testosterone levels) is an associated medical condition to the condition of having low testosterone. If you think this is strange logic, you would be correct. There are some who feel that the manufacturer of AndroGel, realizing that it had a profitable "cure" for a disease that did not exist, simply invented a disease with ten associated symptoms (see quiz above). Recent studies have shown that certain groups of men taking testosterone will have increased risks of stroke and heart attack. Lawsuits are now being filed against the manufacturers of AndroGel and other testosterone products for failing to warn consumers about the deadly harm that testosterone can cause. Without getting technical, testosterone has been shown to increase the red blood count (thickening of the blood) which can cause clotting issues leading to stroke and heart attack.

     If your physician has prescribed AndroGel for you, you should immediately discuss whether you truly need it and whether there are safer alternative drugs. After weighing the risks and benefits, you and your physician can determine what drug, if any, is best for you. If you or a loved one live in California, have taken AndroGel, and have suffered a stroke, you should know that attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is available to answer your legal questions and help you determine whether you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer of this drug. You can reach Paul J. Molinaro, M.D. J.D. toll free at (888)MDJDLAW. The initial consultation is also free, and if Paul determines that you have a case, and you decide to hire Paul, he will represent you on a contingent basis.
When You Need a Lawyer, Call the Doctor!
Call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Call (888)MDJDLAW

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – SHOULD YOU GET SECOND OPINIONS?

With regard to potential case evaluation, law is as much about opinion as it is about facts. The good medical malpractice case will have substantial injury as a result of medical services done below the standard of care. Both damages and poor practice are needed. Opinions differ greatly as to what constitutes substantial damages and poor practice.
Licensed healthcare providers (nurses, physicians, dentists, chiropractors, and anyone else with a healthcare license) must practice with no less than the level of learning and skill ordinarily possessed by others in the same or similar locality and under the same circumstances. To fail to do so breaches the "standard of care."
If you suspect that your physician has been negligent, you should get a second medical opinion from another physician. Your insurance plan might even cover the expense of second opinions. Contact your insurance carrier to learn more about your rights to a second opinion. If the second opinion suggests that your initial care was below the standard of care, or if you are not able to get a reliable second opinion, you can consult a medical malpractice attorney.
When consulting an attorney, be ready to provide dates, times, and names of healthcare providers. Exact dates are needed because there are time limits set by law which must be followed when suing a healthcare provider. Time limits are set by a "statute of limitations." Thus, if you suspect you are a victim of medical negligence, do not delay in seeking legal advice.
Your attorney can evaluate your case (sometimes for a fee), and provide you with an opinion as to whether you should sue or not sue. Feel free to disagree with the first attorney's opinion, should that attorney tell you that you have no case. Get a second and a third opinion, but if all these opinions agree that you have no case, you should seriously consider accepting that you have no case.
Each lawyer will have different experiences and knowledge bases as to your potential case, and every medical malpractice case is unique. Thus, seeking a few opinions is wise and will provide the broadest level of evaluation for your specific situation.
The second opinion is valuable in medical care and legal practice. Take advantage of it!
- Paul
Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Attorney at Law, Physician, Broker
Fransen & Molinaro, LLP
980 Montecito Drive, Suite 206
Corona, CA 92879
(951)520-9684
** This post and all others I make on Internet are for informational purposes only. None of the information or materials I post are legal advice. Nothing I post as comments, answers, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While I try to be accurate, I do not guarantee accuracy.